VMware Getting into PaaS with SpringSource Acquisition
According to the post by VMware CTO Steve Herrod, he states that since it's founding 11 years ago, VMware has focused on simplifying IT. More to the point saying "VMware has traditionally treated the applications and operating systems running within our virtual machines (VMs) as black boxes with relatively little knowledge about what they were doing."
Moreover I too believe that the operating system seems to get in the way more then it helps. Add in overly complex hyper-visors and you've got several layers too many of abstraction when we all know the real work gets done in the application layer. Everything else just subtracts from the end goal -- Building and deploying scalable applications which at the end of the day is the only reason to have any sort of IT infrastructure anyway.
VMware even has a nice picture to illustrate their the new PaaS initiative:
The announcement goes on to outline "common goals for developers to easily build their applications and move from coding to production execution as seamlessly as possible… regardless of whether they will be deployed to a small internal datacenter for limited use or to a completely external cloud provider for much larger scale audiences (and the hopes of achieving Facebook application stardom!). This end state has a lot in common with what is today referred to as “platform as a service” (abbreviated PaaS). Salesforce.com’s Force.com and Google’s AppEngine are two of the best known examples of PaaS today."
A few weeks ago Tom Lounibos, CEO of Soasta summed up the opportunity when asked "What's the future for Cloud "IaaS" vendors?"...he replied..."becoming "PaaS" vendors". So true
Labels: Cloud Computing, Hyperic, open source, platform as a service, SpringSource, vmware







4 Comments :
Great summary, esp the critique of an antiquated OS architecture.
Cloud will 'really' happen when developers have the tools, ecosystems, and management support to be there.
This buy is a huge blessing of VMware to begin developing in the cloud with their R&D support.
seeing vmware as a top player in providing platforms to the masses makes me no more comfortable than microsoft doing such... or any other commercial company doing so.. therefor they must be defeated as well... vmware your capitalist consuming nature stunts innovation... you will go down... so will microsoft... thank you linux... goodbye...
How exactly do operating systems "get in the way"? I don't mean some specific operating system, such as Windows, but operating systems as a category. The "get rid of operating systems" meme is getting pretty common, but it seems to me like a silly attitude most often held by the sorts of people who think HTML is a programming language. Operating systems provide a reasonably standard, stable interface flexible enough to develop many kinds of programs. Sure you can run your application on top of some higher-level framework and not care about operating systems . . . so long as somebody else used the operating system to develop things like the filesystems and databases and compilers/interpreters that you rely on. How can anyone seriously think it's better to have the developer job market split between about two dozen competing application frameworks, none of which provide the full functionality or performance of a real OS, than between two or three fully featured OSes?
SpringSource is going Cloud-native. Travel details can be found on Burton Group's Application Platform Strategy blog.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post :
Create a Link
<< Home